Common

Naturalistic fallacy

Purported fallacy in explaining good reductively

Naturalistic fallacy

Common card · No. 310670

In metaethics, the naturalistic fallacy is the claim that it is possible to define good in terms of merely described entities, properties, or processes such as pleasant, desirable, or fitness. The term was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica. Moore's naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the is–ought problem, which comes from David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature (1738–40); however, unlike Hume's view of the is–ought problem, Moore (and other proponents of ethical non-naturalism) did not consider the naturalistic fallacy to be at odds with moral realism.

Read on Wikipedia

Open boosters, collect cards and trade them. Free to play.

Play for free
Naturalistic fallacy – Common Wikipedia card | Wikiverse TCG