
Hume's fork
English philosophy

English philosophy
In epistemology, Hume's fork is a tenet elaborating upon British empiricist philosopher David Hume's emphatic division between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact." (Alternatively, Hume's fork may refer to what is otherwise termed Hume's law, a tenet of ethics.) As phrased in Immanuel Kant's characterization of Hume's thesis, and furthered in the 1930s by the logical empiricists, Hume's fork asserts that all statements are exclusively either "analytic a priori" or "synthetic a posteriori," which, respectively, are universally true by mere definition or, however apparently probable, are unknowable without exact experience. By Hume's fork, a statement's meaning either is analytic or is synthetic, the statement's truth—its agreement with the real world—either is necessary or is contingent, and the statement's purported knowledge either is a priori or is a posteriori. An analytic statement is true via its terms' meanings alone, hence true by definition, like Bachelors are unmarried, whereas...
Read on Wikipedia · Image Original by en:User:Sdorrance, this SVG by Maddy from Celeste, CC BY-SA 2.5
Open boosters, collect cards and trade them. Free to play.
Play for free