Moral relativism
Philosophical positions
Philosophical positions
Moral relativism or ethical relativism (often reformulated as relativist ethics or relativist morality) is used to describe several philosophical positions concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different peoples and cultures. An advocate of such ideas is often referred to as a relativist. Descriptive moral relativism holds that people do, in fact, disagree fundamentally about what is moral, without passing any evaluative or normative judgments about this disagreement. Meta-ethical moral relativism holds that the truth value of moral judgments is not universal and depends on the moral standards of individuals or groups. Normative moral relativism holds that everyone ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when large disagreements about morality exist. Though often intertwined, these are distinct positions. Each can be held independently of the others. American philosopher Richard Rorty in particular has argued that the label of being a "relativist" has become warped...
Open boosters, collect cards and trade them. Free to play.
Play for free