Common
Counterfactual conditional
Conditionals that discuss what would have been if things were otherwise
Counterfactual conditional
Counterfactual conditionals (also contrafactual/subjunctive/X-marked conditionals) are conditional sentences that describe what would have been true if circumstances had been different, typically when the antecedent is taken to be false or incompatible with what actually happened. In English they are often formed with a past or irrealis morphology, as in "If Peter believed in ghosts, he would be afraid to be here", and are standardly contrasted with indicative conditionals, which are generally used to discuss live or open possibilities. The name subjunctive conditionals is sometimes preferred because counterfactuals are not always "contrary to fact" as the word "counterfactual" implies, but the name counterfactual conditionals is sometimes preferred because counterfactuals are not always grammatically subjunctive. Hence the name X-marking has been developed as a compromise, although it is newer in the literature; see § Terminology. Counterfactuals are central topics in philosophical logic...
Open boosters, collect cards and trade them. Free to play.
Play for free