Dutch book arguments
Thought experiment, to justify Bayesian probability
Thought experiment, to justify Bayesian probability
In decision theory, economics, and probability theory, the Dutch book arguments are a set of results showing that agents must satisfy the axioms of rational choice to avoid a kind of self-contradiction called a Dutch book. A Dutch book, sometimes also called a money pump, is a set of bets that ensures a guaranteed loss, i.e., the gambler will lose money no matter what happens. A set of bets is called coherent if it cannot result in a Dutch book. The Dutch book arguments are used to explore degrees of certainty in beliefs, and demonstrate that rational bet-setters must be Bayesian; in other words, a rational bet-setter must assign event probabilities that behave according to the axioms of probability, and must have preferences that can be modeled using the von Neumann–Morgenstern axioms. In economics, they are used to model behavior by ruling out situations where agents "burn money" for no real reward. Models based on the assumption that actors are rational are called rational choice models...
Open boosters, collect cards and trade them. Free to play.
Play for free